metrehelp.org

Verse forms

Lyric Stanzas

Verse forms

The metrical families one by one: dactylic, iambic, trochaic, aeolic, ionic, anapaestic, dochmiac and the rest.

Stanzas and epodes · 1 of 5

Asynarteta: Hephaestion's 'unjoined' lines

Hephaestion devotes the fifteenth chapter of his handbook to a class of lines he calls ἀσυνάρτητα (asynartēta), “unjoined” lines. Modern books still often use the term.[1] His definition is short enough to quote:[2]

Γίνεται δὲ καὶ ἀσυνάρτητα, ὁπόταν δύο κῶλα μὴ δυνάμενα ἀλλήλοις συναρτηθῆναι μηδὲ ἕνωσιν ἔχειν ἀντὶ ἑνὸς μόνου παραλαμβάνηται στίχου.
There are also “unjoined” lines, whenever two cola that cannot be fitted to one another or form a unity are taken in place of a single line.

West’s comment is that the ancient metricians rightly saw that the two parts were independent. But they missed the fact that the gap between them is the same kind of gap as separates two periods written on different lines. An asynarteton is simply two periods written on one line, and the brevis in longo or hiatus at the join is ordinary period-end.[1] Archilochus’ epodes can be presented in the same modern way, as small strophes of two or three end-stopped verses. Each verse is marked off by ‖, and the verses are built from iambic cola and the dactylic hemiepes D.[3] Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε ‖ χρῆμά τοι γελοῖον is such a case. The names Hephaestion attaches to the commonest combinations survive in commentaries, so they are listed here with West’s equivalents.

Archilochus’ asynarteta. Hephaestion says Archilochus was the first to use them,[4] and lists three. (1) An “anapaestic hephthemimer” plus the “trochaic hemiolion called the ithyphallic”. This is his analysis of Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε χρῆμά τοι γελοῖον, which West writes × D — ‖ ith.[5] A hephthemimer is seven half-feet, here three and a half anapaests. A hemiolion is one and a half metra: the ithyphallic, — ⏑ — ⏑ — —, is a trochaic metron and a half. Hephaestion’s reading and West’s divide the first colon differently:

Ἐρασμονίδη Χαρίλαε

Ἐ⏑eρασ—rasμο⏑moνί⏑niδη—dēΧα⏑chaρί⏑riλα—lāε×eiambanapaestanapaest½2nd paeon for ionicchoriambic×D—

Charilaus son of Erasmon,

Archilochus fr. 168.1, three ways. Grey: Hephaestion’s “anapaestic hephthemimer”, three and a half anapaests, the first replaced by an iamb (Enchiridion 8.7, 15.2). Red: his “prosodiac”, an ionic a maiore (here a second paeon, ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑, in its place) and a choriambic colon (15.3–4). Ochre: West, × D —, with the brevis in longo at the end.

synthetic ∿

(2) A dactylic tetrapody plus the same ithyphallic, οὐκέθ’ ὁμῶς θάλλεις ἁπαλὸν χρόα· κάρφεται γὰρ ἤδη. This is a metre “much used by the more recent poets” (our rendering), with examples from Callimachus and, with a catalectic dactylic colon, Cratinus (4da ¦ ith).[6] (3) A dactylic penthemimer plus an acatalectic iambic dimeter:[7]

ἀλλά μ’ ὁ λυσιμελής

dactylic penthemimer, D — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ —ἀλ—alλά⏑laμ’ὁ⏑m’hoλυ—lȳσι⏑siμε⏑meλής×lēs

ὠταῖρε, δάμναται πόθος

iambic dimeter × — ⏑ —ὠ—ōταῖ—taiρε⏑reδάμ—dam× — ⏑ —να⏑naται—taiπό⏑poθος×thos

But limb-loosening desire, my friend, overpowers me.

Archilochus fr. 196, quoted by Hephaestion, Enchiridion 15.9. Hephaestion’s “dactylic penthemimer” is five half-feet of dactyls, two dactyls and a single long: West’s D.

synthetic ∿

Hephaestion adds a long argument that the opening colon of (1) is not really anapaestic but “prosodiac”, made of an ionic and a choriamb. The poets after Archilochus, he argues, avoided the spondees that an anapaestic reading would permit.[8] This is the ancient sense of prosodiac, a term which modern writers use in various senses.[9] It is one reason this site keeps to West’s symbols.

The named dicola. A dicolon is a verse made of two cola. The following table gives Hephaestion’s names, his description, and West’s notation where the glossary supplies one.

Hephaestion’s name His description West
ἐγκωμιολογικόν (encomiologicum) dactylic penthemimer + iambic penthemimer; used by Alcaeus and often by Anacreon (15.10) elegiambus, D × e ×[10]
ἰαμβέλεγος (iambelegus) the reverse; no one known to use it continuously, only here and there, as Pindar (15.11) × e × D;[11] Lourenço keeps the name for this colon in Euripides[12]
Πλατωνικόν (Platōnikon) “tripenthemimer”: dactylic penthemimers either side of an iambic one; Plato the comic poet (15.12) —
Πινδαρικόν (Pindarikon) the reverse of the Platonic (15.13) —
ἐλεγεῖον (elegeion) the dactylic penthemimer taken twice, the second half always seven syllables, the first with its two feet variable (15.14) the pentameter, D ¦ D ‖, contraction only in the first colon[13]
(unnamed) iambic dimeter + the trochaic hephthemimer “called Euripidean”, as in the Iobacchi ascribed to Archilochus, Δήμητρος ἁγνῆς καὶ Κόρης τὴν πανήγυριν σέβων (15.16); one syllable shorter, it is the “Euripidean fourteen-syllable” (15.17) 2ia + lk, the same lines ([Archil.] 322–3), where Porson’s Law is broken[1]
(unnamed) trochaic dimeter + iambic hephthemimer, Sappho’s ἔστι μοι καλὰ πάϊς (15.18) —
Κρατίνειον (Kratineion) a “mixed choriambic” colon + trochaic hephthemimer; made polyschematist by the comic poets (15.21–22) cratinean, — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏒ — ⏑ — ¦ ○ ○ — × — ⏑ — ‖, ¨gl ¦ gl¨∧ (⏒ as West prints it, a short position that admits a long)[10]
(unnamed) two ithyphallics, Sappho’s δεῦρο δηῦτε Μοῖσαι (15.25) —

In West’s column D is — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ —, e is — ⏑ —, and × is an anceps, a position that takes a long or a short. So the encomiologicum, D × e ×, runs — ⏑ ⏑ — ⏑ ⏑ — × — ⏑ — ×.

Hephaestion’s treatment of the elegiac pentameter as an asynarteton (15.14–15) is of interest. It preserves the ancient perception that the pentameter is two independent cola with an obligatory cut. The ἐλεγεῖον, he says, must always be divided at one of the two penthemimers, or it is faulty.[14] West makes the same point in modern terms: two hemiepes always divided by a caesura, with contraction limited to the first.[13] Battezzato writes the couplet hexameter ‖ D | D. Contraction is avoided in the second half of the pentameter.[15]

What to take from this. For a learner the useful residue is small. The names encomiologicum and iambelegus are still used for the D-plus-e pairings that, in a Pindaric strophe, this site simply labels D × e and × e D. “Asynartete” marks a line that an editor should read as two periods. And Archilochus’ epodic combinations were taken over unchanged by Hellenistic poets.[16] Old Comedy went the other way, with West’s “comic dicola”. These are verses compounded from two simple cola and used in stichic series. One of them, × D ⁝ × ⁝ ith ‖ in Wasps 1528–37, joins in a single line the two cola that make up Archilochus’ epodic strophe × D — ‖ ith |||.[17] Where the ancient and modern analyses disagree, as over the “anapaestic” or “prosodiac” opening of Ἐρασμονίδη, this site follows West and says so.

Notes

  1. ^ a b c West 1987, p. 32.
  2. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.1.
  3. ^ Battezzato 2009, pp. 137–138; D’Angour 2022, pp. 135–136.
  4. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.2.
  5. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.2; West 1987, p. 32.
  6. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.8; West 1987, p. 31.
  7. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.9.
  8. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.3–6.
  9. ^ West 1987, p. 89.
  10. ^ a b West 1987, p. 86.
  11. ^ West 1987, p. 87.
  12. ^ Lourenço 2011, pp. 84–85.
  13. ^ a b West 1987, p. 24.
  14. ^ Hephaestion, Ench. 15.15.
  15. ^ Battezzato 2009, p. 138.
  16. ^ West 1987, p. 76.
  17. ^ West 1987, pp. 49–50.
Picture credits on this page
  1. Behind the title: P.Oxy. IV 659 col. i: Pindar, Partheneion, with a coronis marking the end of a strophe. Plate from Grenfell and Hunt, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri IV (1904). Egypt Exploration Fund (B. P. Grenfell and A. S. Hunt, 1904) · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
  2. Women with lyres and auloi: interior of an Attic red-figure kylix by the Painter of Louvre G 456, c. 450 BC, from Vulci. Bologna, Museo Civico Archeologico PU 271. Painter of Louvre G 456; photo: ArchaiOptix · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
  3. Heracles fighting Geryon, the subject of Stesichorus' Geryoneis: side A of an Attic red-figure kylix painted by Euphronios (potter Kachrylion), 510–500 BC, from Vulci. Munich, Staatliche Antikensammlungen 2620. Euphronios (painter), Kachrylion (potter); photo: Bibi Saint-Pol · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
  4. Boxers: side B of an Attic black-figure amphora of Panathenaic shape by the Antimenes Painter, c. 520 BC. New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art 06.1021.51. Antimenes Painter; photo: Marie-Lan Nguyen · CC BY 2.5 · via Wikimedia Commons
  5. Komast with a barbitos: Attic red-figure kylix by the Chairias Painter, c. 510–500 BC. Athens, Ancient Agora Museum P 24115. Chairias Painter; photo: Zde · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons